From nobody Tue Sep 10 11:05:40 2002
X-From-Line: dgc@spies.com Sat Sep 07 18:16:19 2002
Received: from mail by junk.nocrew.org with spam-scanned (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	for lars@nocrew.org
	id 17niFv-0005yW-00; Sat, 07 Sep 2002 18:16:19 +0200
Received: from spies.com ([199.106.69.36] ident=root)
	by junk.nocrew.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	for lars@nocrew.org
	id 17niFu-0005yQ-00; Sat, 07 Sep 2002 18:16:18 +0200
Received: from spies.com (dgc@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spies.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/Debian-1) with ESMTP id g87GHK1Z015819
	for <lars@nocrew.org>; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 09:17:21 -0700
Received: (from dgc@localhost)
	by spies.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/Debian-1) id g87GHJxN015818
	for lars@nocrew.org; Sat, 7 Sep 2002 09:17:19 -0700
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2002 09:17:19 -0700
From: Dave Conroy <dgc@spies.com>
X-Gnus-Mail-Source: file:/var/spool/mail/lars
Message-Id: <200209071617.g87GHJxN015818@spies.com>
To: lars@nocrew.org
Subject: Re: fpga pdp-10 status report
In-Reply-To: <85n0qui2vf.fsf@junk.nocrew.org>
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO version=2.20
X-Spam-Level: 
Lines: 4
Xref: junk.nocrew.org personal:7813

I'm thinking something like 30ns microcycle and 15ns memory clock.
It will be limited by the speed the external control store can cycle (I think)
and the cheap srams for that are 15ns address-to-data.